PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCOM vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCOM vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCOM achieves a 47.10% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, QCOM has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 19.54%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.


QCOM

1D
3.81%
1M
48.48%
YTD
47.10%
6M
44.46%
1Y
71.79%
3Y*
31.99%
5Y*
15.61%
10Y*
19.54%

USFR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCOM vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
47.10%13.84%8.31%35.07%-38.58%22.25%77.08%60.76%-7.59%2.05%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.60%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.98%-0.03%0.56%2.02%2.01%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between QCOM and USFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014

0.01

The correlation between QCOM and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCOM vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCOM
QCOM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCOM vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCOMUSFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-48.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

13.43

-12.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

203.42

-201.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

787.84

-782.92

QCOM vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 15.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCOM and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCOMUSFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

15.11

-13.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

9.26

-8.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

3.07

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.60

-1.17

Drawdowns

QCOM vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCOM drawdown since its inception was -86.75%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCOM and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCOMUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.75%

-1.36%

-85.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.13%

-0.02%

-33.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.23%

-0.06%

-44.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.29%

-0.18%

-44.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-0.80%

-43.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

0.00%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.89%

-0.16%

-32.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.65%

0.01%

+14.64%

Volatility

QCOM vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) has a higher volatility of 28.47% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that QCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCOMUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.47%

0.06%

+28.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.80%

0.18%

+38.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.89%

0.27%

+45.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.55%

0.40%

+40.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.95%

0.81%

+38.14%

Dividends

QCOM vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

QCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
1.42%2.06%2.18%2.18%2.67%1.47%1.69%2.81%4.27%3.50%3.17%3.72%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.91%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCOM and USFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCOM has higher volatility (28.47%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCOM dropped -86.75% vs USFR's -1.36%.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.11 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCOM and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer