PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCOM vs. FTBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCOM vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCOM achieves a 30.40% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, QCOM has outperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 18.41%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


QCOM

1D
4.29%
1M
9.99%
YTD
30.40%
6M
24.43%
1Y
45.72%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
18.41%

FTBFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.10%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.92%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCOM vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
30.40%13.84%8.31%35.07%-38.58%22.25%77.08%60.76%-7.59%2.05%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
0.46%7.50%2.13%7.25%-13.58%-0.44%9.34%9.89%-0.66%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QCOM and FTBFX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2002

-0.06

The correlation between QCOM and FTBFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCOM vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCOM
QCOM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FTBFX
FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCOM vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCOMFTBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.65

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

4.84

-1.76

QCOM vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCOM and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCOM vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCOM drawdown since its inception was -86.75%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCOM and FTBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCOMFTBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.75%

-18.25%

-68.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.13%

-2.89%

-30.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.23%

-5.82%

-38.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.29%

-18.25%

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-18.25%

-26.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.71%

-1.41%

-10.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.87%

-2.32%

-30.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.90%

0.99%

+13.91%

Volatility

QCOM vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) has a higher volatility of 26.79% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.44%. This indicates that QCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCOMFTBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.79%

1.44%

+25.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.38%

2.84%

+39.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.72%

3.82%

+44.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.22%

5.67%

+35.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.31%

4.73%

+34.58%

Dividends

QCOM vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

QCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than FTBFX's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
4.36%4.36%4.15%4.15%2.54%1.89%5.22%3.03%3.19%2.97%3.61%3.30%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
1.63%2.06%2.18%2.18%2.67%1.47%1.69%2.81%4.27%3.50%3.17%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCOM and FTBFX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCOM has higher volatility (26.79%) compared to FTBFX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCOM dropped -86.75% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

FTBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCOM and FTBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer