PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QCN.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF
4.40%31.83%21.95%11.28%-5.45%24.65%7.16%
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
0.93%18.19%21.41%15.35%-9.30%13.37%7.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCN.TO achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than MGRW.TO's 0.93% return.


QCN.TO

1D
0.59%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
4.40%
6M
10.59%
1Y
34.71%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*

MGRW.TO

1D
3.33%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
0.93%
6M
3.87%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCN.TO
QCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
QCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MGRW.TO
MGRW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCN.TOMGRW.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

1.64

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

2.29

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.35

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.00

+1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.55

8.61

+5.94

QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCN.TO and MGRW.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCN.TOMGRW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.64

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

1.02

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.13

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between QCN.TO and MGRW.TO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Dividend Comparison

QCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than MGRW.TO's 1.88% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QCN.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF
2.08%2.19%2.74%3.37%3.26%2.45%3.02%3.07%2.73%
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
1.88%1.84%1.93%2.28%2.44%1.77%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than MGRW.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCN.TO and MGRW.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QCN.TOMGRW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.90%

-17.20%

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-9.38%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-17.20%

+0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-3.49%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-3.45%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.18%

+0.25%

Volatility

QCN.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) at 4.79%. This indicates that QCN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGRW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QCN.TOMGRW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

4.79%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

7.79%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

11.59%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

10.54%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

10.46%

+5.37%