QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QCN.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF) and FCCV.TO (Fidelity Canadian Value ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - QCN.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Broad Market Index while FCCV.TO tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QCN.TO returned 15.40%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for FCCV.TO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCN.TO charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FCCV.TO.

Performance

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Value ETF (FCCV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCN.TO achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly lower than FCCV.TO's 16.48% return.

QCN.TO

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 5.07%
• YTD: 12.23%
• 6M: 13.35%
• 1Y: 37.15%
• 3Y*: 24.36%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: —

FCCV.TO

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 5.64%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 48.88%
• 3Y*: 25.60%
• 5Y*: 17.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF	12.23%	31.83%	21.95%	11.28%	-5.45%	24.65%	12.85%
FCCV.TO Fidelity Canadian Value ETF	16.48%	36.93%	15.47%	11.16%	-3.35%	34.98%	20.55%

Correlation

The correlation between QCN.TO and FCCV.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2020	0.75

The correlation between QCN.TO and FCCV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QCN.TO	FCCV.TO
Financial Services	33.2%	38.7%
Energy	18.3%	11.4%
Basic Materials	17.9%	23.0%
Industrials	10.5%	3.5%
Technology	7.3%	12.4%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	-
Utilities	2.7%	-
Communication Services	1.8%	5.7%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.7%
Healthcare	0.2%	3.7%

Return for Risk

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCN.TO

QCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
QCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
QCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FCCV.TO

FCCV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
FCCV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FCCV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FCCV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FCCV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FCCV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Value ETF (FCCV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QCN.TO	FCCV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	3.51	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	4.43	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.64	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	5.02	-1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.39	22.71	-4.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the FCCV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCN.TO and FCCV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCN.TO	FCCV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	3.51	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	1.19	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.47	-0.64

Drawdowns

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than FCCV.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCN.TO and FCCV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCN.TO	FCCV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.90%	-19.81%	-17.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-9.79%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.26%	-12.31%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.30%	-19.81%	+3.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.17%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-3.54%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	2.16%	-0.13%

Volatility

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) is 3.49%, while Fidelity Canadian Value ETF (FCCV.TO) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that QCN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCCV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCN.TO	FCCV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	3.99%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.57%	11.42%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.85%	14.02%	-1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	15.00%	-1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.75%	14.77%	+0.98%

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCN.TO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FCCV.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCN.TO vs. FCCV.TO - Dividend Comparison

QCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than FCCV.TO's 1.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCCV.TO Fidelity Canadian Value ETF	1.58%	1.84%	2.59%	3.01%	2.45%	1.66%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF	1.94%	2.19%	2.74%	3.37%	3.26%	2.45%	3.02%	3.07%	2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCN.TO and FCCV.TO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, QCN.TO and FCCV.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QCN.TO or FCCV.TO?

On fees, QCN.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCN.TO or FCCV.TO?

QCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FCCV.TO.

What is the main difference between QCN.TO and FCCV.TO?

QCN.TO tracks Solactive Canada Broad Market Index, while FCCV.TO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for QCN.TO and 0.35% for FCCV.TO.