PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCLN.L vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QCLN.L vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QCLN.L vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QCLN.L
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc
6.40%20.09%7.79%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
-3.34%13.49%9.69%
Different Trading Currencies

QCLN.L is traded in GBp, while QTOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTOP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLN.L achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than QTOP's -3.34% return.


QCLN.L

1D
4.13%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
6.40%
6M
12.92%
1Y
56.73%
3Y*
-5.39%
5Y*
-6.78%
10Y*

QTOP

1D
1.17%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
-3.34%
6M
-0.89%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QCLN.L vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLN.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QCLN.L vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLN.L
QCLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QCLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLN.L vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCLN.LQTOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

1.03

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

1.58

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

1.97

+1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.69

5.47

+6.21

QCLN.L vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLN.L and QTOP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCLN.LQTOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.03

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.27

0.60

-0.87

Correlation

The correlation between QCLN.L and QTOP is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QCLN.L vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

QCLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


Drawdowns

QCLN.L vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -25.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN.L and QTOP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QCLN.LQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.87%

-23.28%

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-12.88%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.30%

-8.35%

-35.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.17%

-4.12%

-37.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

3.78%

+1.14%

Volatility

QCLN.L vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L) has a higher volatility of 10.20% compared to iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) at 6.39%. This indicates that QCLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QCLN.LQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.20%

6.39%

+3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.06%

13.57%

+11.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.88%

23.74%

+11.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.74%

23.28%

+12.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.72%

23.28%

+13.44%