QCLN.DE vs. JMLP.DE
QCLN.DE (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc) and JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - QCLN.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD while JMLP.DE tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QCLN.DE returned 2.29%/yr vs 23.96%/yr for JMLP.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCLN.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMLP.DE.
Performance
QCLN.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLN.DE achieves a 49.11% return, which is significantly higher than JMLP.DE's 27.39% return.
QCLN.DE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 49.11%
- 6M
- 47.01%
- 1Y
- 111.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- —
JMLP.DE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 27.39%
- 6M
- 24.82%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- 23.96%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 49.11% | 16.50% | -14.54% | -10.39% | -26.09% | -12.74% |
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 27.39% | -5.93% | 44.53% | 15.63% | 34.66% | 36.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLN.DE and JMLP.DE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2021 | 0.25 |
The correlation between QCLN.DE and JMLP.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCLN.DE vs. JMLP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QCLN.DE
JMLP.DE
QCLN.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCLN.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.22 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.93 | 2.22 | +5.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.33 | 6.04 | +18.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCLN.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20 | 1.30 | +1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 1.16 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 1.35 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
QCLN.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLN.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.59%, which is greater than JMLP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN.DE and JMLP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLN.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.59% | -22.29% | -47.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.04% | -11.02% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.68% | -22.29% | -34.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.59% | -22.29% | -47.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.21% | -5.15% | -15.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.08% | -5.87% | -33.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 4.05% | +0.54% |
Volatility
QCLN.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.59% compared to HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) at 6.65%. This indicates that QCLN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMLP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCLN.DE | JMLP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.59% | 6.65% | +7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.80% | 15.30% | +9.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.84% | 18.80% | +16.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.29% | 20.38% | +15.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.76% | 21.66% | +15.10% |
QCLN.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLN.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JMLP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCLN.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Dividend Comparison
QCLN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 2.77% | 3.38% | 5.41% | 11.39% | 11.27% | 14.07% | 8.95% |
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCLN.DE and JMLP.DE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMLP.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMLP.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
QCLN.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLN.DE and 0.40% for JMLP.DE.
Find the right allocation for QCLN.DE and JMLP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer