QCJL vs. AIRR
QCJL (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCJL is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). QCJL is actively managed, while AIRR is passively managed. Over the past year, QCJL returned 14.55% vs 69.39% for AIRR. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCJL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
QCJL vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCJL achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 34.13% return.
QCJL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 34.13%
- 6M
- 32.46%
- 1Y
- 69.39%
- 3Y*
- 38.63%
- 5Y*
- 25.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
QCJL vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July | 5.19% | 13.10% | 4.12% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 34.13% | 27.92% | 5.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCJL and AIRR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between QCJL and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCJL vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
QCJL
AIRR
QCJL vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCJL | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.43 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 5.33 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.55 | 19.70 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCJL | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.75 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.68 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
QCJL vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCJL drawdown since its inception was -11.18%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCJL and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCJL | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -42.37% | +31.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.00% | -13.09% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.11% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -7.42% | +6.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 3.53% | -2.74% |
Volatility
QCJL vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL) is 0.39%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that QCJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCJL | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 6.86% | -6.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.31% | 19.88% | -15.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.88% | 25.35% | -19.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 25.30% | -15.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 26.29% | -16.82% |
QCJL vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCJL vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
QCJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCJL and AIRR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to QCJL (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCJL dropped -11.18% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 1-year performance, AIRR leads with 69.39% vs 14.55% for QCJL. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, QCJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 69.39% return vs 14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIRR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCJL.
AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for QCJL.
QCJL is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AIRR is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QCJL and 0.70% for AIRR.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCJL and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer