PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCILIX vs. TISCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCILIX vs. TISCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3 (QCILIX) and TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCILIX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than TISCX's 11.18% return.


QCILIX

1D
0.01%
1M
0.01%
6M
0.69%
YTD
1.25%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.47%

TISCX

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.25%
6M
9.45%
YTD
11.18%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
13.80%
ALL TIME*
8.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QCILIX vs. TISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QCILIX
CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3
1.25%7.47%0.00%
TISCX
TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund
11.18%16.51%-2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QCILIX and TISCX is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCILIX vs. TISCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QCILIX
QCILIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QCILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QCILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

TISCX
TISCX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QCILIX vs. TISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3 (QCILIX) and TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCILIXTISCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.86

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

7.45

-0.24

QCILIX vs. TISCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCILIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the TISCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCILIX and TISCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCILIX vs. TISCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCILIX drawdown since its inception was -2.14%, smaller than the maximum TISCX drawdown of -54.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCILIX and TISCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCILIXTISCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.14%

-54.65%

+52.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.33%

-8.76%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-2.50%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-10.04%

+9.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

2.19%

-1.76%

Volatility

QCILIX vs. TISCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3 (QCILIX) is 0.56%, while TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that QCILIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCILIXTISCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

3.21%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.92%

10.63%

-8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

13.57%

-11.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

19.41%

-16.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.94%

19.37%

-16.43%

QCILIX vs. TISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCILIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TISCX's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QCILIX vs. TISCX - Dividend Comparison

QCILIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TISCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCILIX
CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TISCX
TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund
6.97%7.75%16.74%5.64%4.99%9.46%1.38%4.84%9.85%2.38%6.84%3.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCILIX and TISCX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TISCX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to QCILIX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCILIX dropped -2.14% vs TISCX's -54.65%.

QCILIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCILIX and TISCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer