QCILIX vs. EARRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QCILIX (CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3) and EARRX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past year, QCILIX returned 5.23% vs 3.80% for EARRX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCILIX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for EARRX.

Performance

QCILIX vs. EARRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3 (QCILIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCILIX achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than EARRX's 1.58% return.

QCILIX

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.56%
• 1Y: 5.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EARRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 3.80%
• 3Y*: 5.40%
• 5Y*: 3.65%
• 10Y*: 3.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCILIX vs. EARRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QCILIX CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3	1.79%	7.47%	0.00%
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A	1.58%	5.46%	0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between QCILIX and EARRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024	0.78

The correlation between QCILIX and EARRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QCILIX vs. EARRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCILIX

QCILIX Risk / Return Rank: 65
QCILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QCILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QCILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QCILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
QCILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

EARRX

EARRX Risk / Return Rank: 86
EARRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EARRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EARRX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EARRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EARRX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCILIX vs. EARRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3 (QCILIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QCILIX	EARRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.55	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	4.10	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.57	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	4.84	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.48	18.23	-3.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QCILIX vs. EARRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCILIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the EARRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCILIX and EARRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCILIX	EARRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	2.55	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.26	1.07	+1.19

Drawdowns

QCILIX vs. EARRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCILIX drawdown since its inception was -2.14%, smaller than the maximum EARRX drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCILIX and EARRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCILIX	EARRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.14%	-10.27%	+8.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.33%	-0.79%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-6.39%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-10.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.10%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-1.08%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	0.21%	+0.15%

Volatility

QCILIX vs. EARRX - Volatility Comparison

CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3 (QCILIX) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) at 0.49%. This indicates that QCILIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EARRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCILIX	EARRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	0.49%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	1.14%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45%	1.50%	+0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.95%	2.77%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.95%	2.71%	+0.24%

QCILIX vs. EARRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCILIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EARRX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCILIX vs. EARRX - Dividend Comparison

QCILIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EARRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A	3.82%	4.36%	3.83%	4.24%	4.82%	3.32%	2.02%	2.46%	2.67%	1.90%	2.00%	1.73%
QCILIX CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Account Class R3	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCILIX and EARRX in my portfolio?

QCILIX and EARRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QCILIX or EARRX?

QCILIX has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to EARRX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCILIX dropped -2.14% vs EARRX's -10.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EARRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.