PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCELX vs. SLGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCELX vs. SLGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund (SLGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCELX achieves a 18.09% return, which is significantly higher than SLGAX's 9.56% return. Over the past 10 years, QCELX has outperformed SLGAX with an annualized return of 15.20%, while SLGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.05% annualized return.


QCELX

1D
-0.25%
1M
6.79%
YTD
18.09%
6M
19.95%
1Y
38.37%
3Y*
27.48%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
15.20%

SLGAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
4.84%
YTD
9.56%
6M
10.49%
1Y
25.19%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCELX vs. SLGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
18.09%23.38%22.73%26.30%-15.73%27.18%14.93%24.33%-10.96%22.73%
SLGAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund
9.56%17.41%20.38%19.49%-16.03%24.30%11.60%29.13%-6.92%22.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QCELX and SLGAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.96

The correlation between QCELX and SLGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCELX vs. SLGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCELX
QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SLGAX
SLGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SLGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCELX vs. SLGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund (SLGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCELXSLGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.11

2.27

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.21

3.17

+1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.41

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

3.13

+1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.00

14.19

+8.81

QCELX vs. SLGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCELX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the SLGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCELX and SLGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCELXSLGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

2.27

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.56

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.67

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.69

+0.04

Drawdowns

QCELX vs. SLGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCELX drawdown since its inception was -33.52%, smaller than the maximum SLGAX drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCELX and SLGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCELXSLGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.52%

-36.80%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-8.39%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-28.89%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-28.89%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.52%

-36.80%

+3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.13%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-4.88%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.85%

-0.13%

Volatility

QCELX vs. SLGAX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund (SLGAX) at 2.90%. This indicates that QCELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCELXSLGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.90%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

8.77%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

11.56%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

19.58%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

19.67%

-0.70%

QCELX vs. SLGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCELX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than SLGAX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCELX vs. SLGAX - Dividend Comparison

QCELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.19%, less than SLGAX's 19.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
12.19%14.40%12.89%13.67%11.05%12.41%9.94%5.36%7.81%0.99%1.28%0.89%
SLGAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund
19.13%20.96%18.18%6.78%10.41%14.16%3.68%7.27%16.21%7.35%0.94%20.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, QCELX and SLGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QCELX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to SLGAX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCELX dropped -33.52% vs SLGAX's -36.80%.

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCELX and SLGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer