QCELX vs. AMOMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QCELX (AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund) and AMOMX (AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund) are both mutual funds - QCELX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by AQR Funds, while AMOMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AQR Funds. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.41% expense ratio.

Performance

QCELX vs. AMOMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QCELX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: 18.09%
• 6M: 19.95%
• 1Y: 38.37%
• 3Y*: 27.48%
• 5Y*: 16.17%
• 10Y*: 15.20%

AMOMX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCELX vs. AMOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	18.09%	23.38%	22.73%	26.30%	-15.73%	27.18%	14.93%	24.33%	-10.96%	22.73%
AMOMX AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund	11.26%	15.36%	27.62%	18.17%	-18.00%	26.01%	26.86%	29.20%	-4.01%	23.87%

Correlation

The correlation between QCELX and AMOMX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.93

The correlation between QCELX and AMOMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QCELX vs. AMOMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCELX

QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 90
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCELX vs. AMOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QCELX	AMOMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.00	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCELX	AMOMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	QCELX	AMOMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.66%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QCELX	AMOMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.75%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.93%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.97%	—	—

QCELX vs. AMOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QCELX and AMOMX have an expense ratio of 0.41%.

Dividends

QCELX vs. AMOMX - Dividend Comparison

QCELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.19%, less than AMOMX's 30.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMOMX AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund	30.65%	25.49%	14.05%	14.08%	10.95%	17.95%	16.14%	10.22%	12.17%	9.15%	8.23%	8.44%
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	12.19%	14.40%	12.89%	13.67%	11.05%	12.41%	9.94%	5.36%	7.81%	0.99%	1.28%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCELX and AMOMX in my portfolio?

QCELX and AMOMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.