QBTZ vs. ZIVB
QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. QBTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.
Performance
QBTZ vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QBTZ
- 1D
- 16.41%
- 1M
- -74.19%
- YTD
- -86.63%
- 6M
- -91.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTZ vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | 11.99% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTZ vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBTZ | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | — | — |
Drawdowns
QBTZ vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and ZIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTZ | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | 0.00% | -96.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.35% | 0.00% | -95.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.63% | 0.00% | -55.63% |
Volatility
QBTZ vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTZ | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 235.15% | 0.00% | +235.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 235.15% | 0.00% | +235.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 235.15% | 0.00% | +235.15% |
QBTZ vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTZ vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison
Neither QBTZ nor ZIVB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QBTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QBTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
QBTZ and ZIVB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 1.35% for ZIVB.
Find the right allocation for QBTZ and ZIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer