QBTZ vs. XMAG
QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. QBTZ is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. Their -0.49 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QBTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.
Performance
QBTZ vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -84.61% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 12.36% return.
QBTZ
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- 6M
- -87.87%
- YTD
- -84.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XMAG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 21.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.48M | $12.89M | $20.27M | |
| $1.40M | $2.49M | $1.91M |
QBTZ vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -84.61% | -47.53% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 12.36% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTZ and XMAG is -0.49, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | -0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTZ vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank
QBTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XMAG
QBTZ vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTZ | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTZ vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and XMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTZ | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | -16.17% | -79.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.65% | -2.76% | -91.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.87% | -2.07% | -60.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
QBTZ vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTZ | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 230.14% | 12.06% | +218.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 230.14% | 15.03% | +215.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 230.14% | 15.03% | +215.11% |
QBTZ vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTZ vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison
QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTZ and XMAG have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.
XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.
QBTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 0.35% for XMAG.
Find the right allocation for QBTZ and XMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer