PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTZ vs. SPYT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBTZ vs. SPYT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -84.61% return, which is significantly lower than SPYT's 9.33% return.


QBTZ

1D
-1.12%
1M
5.00%
6M
-87.87%
YTD
-84.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

SPYT

1D
0.58%
1M
0.41%
6M
7.91%
YTD
9.33%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.48M$12.89M$20.27M
$1.78M$2.10M$2.34M

QBTZ vs. SPYT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBTZ and SPYT is -0.49, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025

-0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTZ vs. SPYT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QBTZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SPYT
SPYT Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QBTZ vs. SPYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBTZSPYTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

QBTZ vs. SPYT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBTZ vs. SPYT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than SPYT's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and SPYT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTZSPYTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.03%

-18.25%

-77.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.65%

-1.01%

-93.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.87%

-1.98%

-60.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

Volatility

QBTZ vs. SPYT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTZSPYTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

230.14%

11.77%

+218.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

230.14%

14.73%

+215.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

230.14%

14.73%

+215.41%

QBTZ vs. SPYT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYT's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBTZ vs. SPYT - Dividend Comparison

QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.05%.


PositionTTM20252024
QBTZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
19.19%21.40%17.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBTZ and SPYT have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYT is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYT is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.

SPYT has the higher dividend yield at 19.19%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.

QBTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPYT is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 0.87% for SPYT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTZ and SPYT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer