QBTZ vs. ELIS
QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and ELIS (Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. QBTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ELIS.
Performance
QBTZ vs. ELIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QBTZ
- 1D
- 16.41%
- 1M
- -74.19%
- YTD
- -86.63%
- 6M
- -91.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELIS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTZ vs. ELIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -86.63% | -50.03% |
ELIS Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares | 11.37% | -21.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTZ and ELIS is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTZ vs. ELIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares (ELIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBTZ | ELIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | — | — |
Drawdowns
QBTZ vs. ELIS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTZ | ELIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.35% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.63% | — | — |
Volatility
QBTZ vs. ELIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTZ | ELIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 235.15% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 235.15% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 235.15% | — | — |
QBTZ vs. ELIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ELIS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTZ vs. ELIS - Dividend Comparison
QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ELIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ELIS Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares | 5.26% | 5.86% |
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTZ and ELIS have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ELIS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ELIS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.
ELIS has the higher dividend yield at 5.26%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 0.97% for ELIS.
Find the right allocation for QBTZ and ELIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer