QBF vs. TOXR
QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and TOXR (21Shares XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Innovator, while TOXR is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. QBF is actively managed, while TOXR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QBF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for TOXR.
Performance
QBF vs. TOXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBF achieves a -23.63% return, which is significantly higher than TOXR's -34.38% return.
QBF
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -14.35%
- YTD
- -23.63%
- 6M
- -27.96%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOXR
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -14.04%
- YTD
- -34.38%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBF vs. TOXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -23.63% | -3.83% |
TOXR 21Shares XRP ETF | -34.38% | -9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBF and TOXR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBF vs. TOXR — Risk / Return Rank
QBF
TOXR
QBF vs. TOXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) and 21Shares XRP ETF (TOXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBF | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBF | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.97 | -0.92 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
QBF vs. TOXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBF drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, smaller than the maximum TOXR drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBF and TOXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBF | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -48.78% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.92% | -48.10% | +5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.82% | -31.50% | +14.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.20% | — | — |
Volatility
QBF vs. TOXR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBF | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.36% | 73.16% | -46.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 73.16% | -44.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 73.16% | -44.63% |
QBF vs. TOXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TOXR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBF vs. TOXR - Dividend Comparison
QBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while TOXR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 1.81% | 1.38% |
TOXR 21Shares XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBF and TOXR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOXR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOXR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.
QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for TOXR.
QBF is categorized as Blockchain, while TOXR is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and 21Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBF and 0.30% for TOXR.
Find the right allocation for QBF and TOXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer