PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBF vs. COZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBF vs. COZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) and Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBF achieves a -23.63% return, which is significantly lower than COZX's 205.40% return.


QBF

1D
-2.17%
1M
-14.35%
YTD
-23.63%
6M
-27.96%
1Y
-35.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COZX

1D
-0.24%
1M
78.54%
YTD
205.40%
6M
125.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBF vs. COZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBF and COZX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBF vs. COZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBF
QBF Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
QBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
QBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBF Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

COZX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBF vs. COZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) and Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBFCOZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

QBF vs. COZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBFCOZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.97

0.23

-1.20

Drawdowns

QBF vs. COZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBF drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, smaller than the maximum COZX drawdown of -70.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBF and COZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBFCOZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.92%

-70.37%

+27.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.92%

-0.24%

-42.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.82%

-44.31%

+27.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.20%

Volatility

QBF vs. COZX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBFCOZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.36%

138.53%

-112.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.53%

138.53%

-110.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.53%

138.53%

-110.00%

QBF vs. COZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than COZX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBF vs. COZX - Dividend Comparison

QBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while COZX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBF and COZX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QBF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QBF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for COZX.

QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for COZX.

QBF is categorized as Blockchain, while COZX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBF and 1.30% for COZX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBF and COZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer