PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBB.TO vs. CDLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBB.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (QBB.TO) and CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBB.TO achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than CDLB.TO's -0.42% return.


QBB.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.68%
6M
0.45%
YTD
0.99%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.41%
10Y*

CDLB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
-0.42%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBB.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QBB.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
0.99%2.70%3.90%7.16%-11.56%-2.12%2.42%
CDLB.TO
CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series
-0.42%5.44%2.91%2.39%-12.02%-0.11%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between QBB.TO and CDLB.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2020

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBB.TO vs. CDLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBB.TO
QBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
QBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
QBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CDLB.TO
CDLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CDLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CDLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBB.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (QBB.TO) and CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBB.TOCDLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.39

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

2.87

+0.85

QBB.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the CDLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBB.TO and CDLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBB.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.70%, roughly equal to the maximum CDLB.TO drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBB.TO and CDLB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBB.TOCDLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.70%

-16.85%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-2.11%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.21%

-5.32%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.32%

-16.85%

+1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-3.30%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-6.34%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

1.02%

+0.08%

Volatility

QBB.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (QBB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO) at 0.69%. This indicates that QBB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBB.TOCDLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

0.69%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

2.45%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

3.83%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.15%

5.36%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.26%

4.91%

+1.35%

Dividends

QBB.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

QBB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than CDLB.TO's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CDLB.TO
CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series
4.54%4.45%4.65%3.87%2.81%2.38%1.14%0.00%0.00%
QBB.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.16%3.22%3.00%2.72%2.42%2.64%2.26%2.72%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBB.TO and CDLB.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBB.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while CDLB.TO is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and CI Global Asset Management.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBB.TO and CDLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer