QALGX vs. GXXIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QALGX (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A) and GXXIX (abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QALGX returned 20.08%/yr vs 14.64%/yr for GXXIX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QALGX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GXXIX.

Performance

QALGX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALGX achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than GXXIX's 5.86% return. Over the past 10 years, QALGX has outperformed GXXIX with an annualized return of 20.08%, while GXXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.64% annualized return.

QALGX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 7.28%
• YTD: 9.64%
• 6M: 11.92%
• 1Y: 28.02%
• 3Y*: 28.51%
• 5Y*: 18.70%
• 10Y*: 20.08%

GXXIX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 6M: 5.57%
• 1Y: 12.38%
• 3Y*: 9.29%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: 14.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QALGX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QALGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	9.64%	19.14%	40.93%	39.32%	-25.07%	30.14%	38.00%	31.73%	1.24%	25.16%
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund	5.86%	3.82%	10.11%	15.19%	-26.55%	81.37%	29.56%	36.96%	-6.73%	20.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QALGX and GXXIX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2011	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between QALGX and GXXIX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QALGX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QALGX

QALGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
QALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
QALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
QALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
QALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

GXXIX

GXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 12
GXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
GXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
GXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
GXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QALGX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QALGX	GXXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.03	+0.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	1.52	+0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.18	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	1.04	+0.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.79	3.99	+1.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QALGX vs. GXXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QALGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the GXXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QALGX and GXXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QALGX	GXXIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.03	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.42	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	0.62	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.65	-0.05

Drawdowns

QALGX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALGX drawdown since its inception was -53.63%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALGX and GXXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QALGX	GXXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.63%	-33.65%	-19.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.86%	-11.78%	-4.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.02%	-19.74%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.12%	-33.65%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.73%	-33.65%	+1.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-6.16%	-3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.00%	3.06%	+1.94%

Volatility

QALGX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 2.87%. This indicates that QALGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QALGX	GXXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	2.87%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.26%	9.32%	+3.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.22%	11.90%	+4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.14%	27.76%	-6.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.34%	23.72%	-2.38%

QALGX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

QALGX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison

QALGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than GXXIX's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund	2.17%	2.30%	0.00%	0.28%	0.39%	59.39%	14.10%	9.76%	12.93%	10.11%	12.20%	5.82%
QALGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	3.12%	3.42%	7.26%	1.59%	14.79%	20.92%	7.92%	5.33%	10.82%	7.70%	0.57%	12.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QALGX and GXXIX in my portfolio?

QALGX and GXXIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QALGX or GXXIX?

QALGX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to GXXIX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QALGX dropped -53.63% vs GXXIX's -33.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QALGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.