PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QALGX vs. FZAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QALGX vs. FZAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALGX achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than FZAPX's 13.27% return. Over the past 10 years, QALGX has outperformed FZAPX with an annualized return of 19.72%, while FZAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.59% annualized return.


QALGX

1D
0.15%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
2.49%
6M
1.67%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
15.88%
10Y*
19.72%

FZAPX

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
13.27%
6M
12.05%
1Y
30.66%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
15.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QALGX vs. FZAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QALGX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
2.49%19.14%40.93%39.32%-25.07%30.14%38.00%31.73%1.24%25.16%
FZAPX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z
13.27%18.98%19.88%27.05%-19.49%23.25%25.03%32.34%-8.52%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between QALGX and FZAPX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between QALGX and FZAPX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QALGX vs. FZAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QALGX
QALGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
QALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
QALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FZAPX
FZAPX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FZAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QALGX vs. FZAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QALGXFZAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.40

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.36

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.42

15.72

-12.30

QALGX vs. FZAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QALGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the FZAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QALGX and FZAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QALGX vs. FZAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALGX drawdown since its inception was -53.63%, which is greater than FZAPX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALGX and FZAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QALGXFZAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.63%

-34.37%

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.86%

-9.20%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.02%

-20.84%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.12%

-25.20%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.73%

-34.37%

+2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.52%

-2.25%

-4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-4.55%

-4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

1.96%

+3.19%

Volatility

QALGX vs. FZAPX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX) at 5.63%. This indicates that QALGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QALGXFZAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

5.63%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

11.08%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

13.87%

+3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

17.90%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

18.59%

+2.78%

QALGX vs. FZAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAPX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

QALGX vs. FZAPX - Dividend Comparison

QALGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than FZAPX's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAPX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z
4.31%4.88%4.91%2.12%0.39%1.47%5.33%6.18%4.59%3.07%1.13%5.24%
QALGX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
3.34%3.42%7.26%1.59%14.79%20.92%7.92%5.33%10.82%7.70%0.57%12.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


QALGX and FZAPX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QALGX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to FZAPX (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QALGX dropped -53.63% vs FZAPX's -34.37%.

FZAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QALGX and FZAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer