QALGX vs. FDSSX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QALGX (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A) and FDSSX (Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QALGX returned 18.99%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for FDSSX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QALGX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FDSSX.

Performance

QALGX vs. FDSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALGX achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than FDSSX's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, QALGX has outperformed FDSSX with an annualized return of 18.99%, while FDSSX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.00% annualized return.

QALGX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: 4.90%
• YTD: 2.67%
• 1Y: 10.24%
• 3Y*: 22.79%
• 5Y*: 14.79%
• 10Y*: 18.99%
• ALL TIME*: 11.92%

FDSSX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 11.74%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 1Y: 29.29%
• 3Y*: 20.09%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 15.00%
• ALL TIME*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QALGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

QALGX vs. FDSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QALGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	2.67%	19.14%	40.93%	39.32%	-25.07%	30.14%	38.00%	31.73%	1.24%	25.16%
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	15.33%	18.89%	19.79%	26.94%	-19.55%	23.14%	24.90%	32.21%	-8.61%	24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QALGX and FDSSX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between QALGX and FDSSX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QALGX vs. FDSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QALGX

QALGX Risk / Return Rank: 13
QALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
QALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
QALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
QALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
QALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FDSSX

FDSSX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FDSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FDSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FDSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FDSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FDSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QALGX vs. FDSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QALGX	FDSSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	1.89	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	2.59	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.34	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	2.94	-2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.81	13.29	-11.48

QALGX vs. FDSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QALGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the FDSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QALGX and FDSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QALGX vs. FDSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALGX drawdown since its inception was -53.63%, smaller than the maximum FDSSX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALGX and FDSSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QALGX	FDSSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.63%	-56.77%	+3.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.86%	-9.19%	-6.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.02%	-20.86%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.12%	-25.22%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.73%	-34.37%	+2.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.36%	-1.58%	-4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.13%	-9.84%	+0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.46%	2.03%	+3.43%

Volatility

QALGX vs. FDSSX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) at 3.79%. This indicates that QALGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QALGX	FDSSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.00%	3.79%	+2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.12%	11.40%	+2.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.07%	14.27%	+3.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.42%	17.90%	+3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.42%	18.58%	+2.84%

QALGX vs. FDSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FDSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QALGX vs. FDSSX - Dividend Comparison

QALGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than FDSSX's 4.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	4.15%	4.79%	4.83%	2.03%	0.36%	0.84%	5.22%	6.09%	4.46%	3.07%	1.04%	5.16%
QALGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	3.33%	3.42%	7.26%	1.59%	14.79%	20.92%	7.92%	5.33%	10.82%	7.70%	0.57%	12.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QALGX and FDSSX in my portfolio?

QALGX and FDSSX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QALGX or FDSSX?

QALGX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to FDSSX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QALGX dropped -53.63% vs FDSSX's -56.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.