PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QABA vs. PSCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QABA vs. PSCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QABA achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than PSCF's 12.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QABA having a 8.33% annualized return and PSCF not far behind at 7.98%.


QABA

1D
1.68%
1M
5.99%
YTD
16.85%
6M
13.71%
1Y
26.59%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
8.33%

PSCF

1D
1.30%
1M
4.77%
YTD
12.95%
6M
11.09%
1Y
22.91%
3Y*
19.88%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
7.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QABA vs. PSCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
16.85%4.62%14.49%-2.18%-9.01%34.20%-10.70%22.85%-16.47%0.75%
PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
12.95%6.19%15.50%6.02%-19.34%27.82%-9.07%23.13%-8.43%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QABA and PSCF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.88

The correlation between QABA and PSCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QABA vs. PSCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QABA
PSCF

Financial Services

99.7%
67.3%

Industrials

0.3%
0.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

28.8%

Technology

-

3.5%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

QABA
99.7%
PSCF
67.3%

Industrials

QABA
0.3%
PSCF
0.4%

Basic Materials

QABA

-

PSCF

-

Communication Services

QABA

-

PSCF

-

Consumer Cyclical

QABA

-

PSCF

-

Consumer Defensive

QABA

-

PSCF

-

Energy

QABA

-

PSCF

-

Healthcare

QABA

-

PSCF

-

Real Estate

QABA

-

PSCF
28.8%

Technology

QABA

-

PSCF
3.5%

Utilities

QABA

-

PSCF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QABA vs. PSCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QABA
QABA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
QABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
QABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
QABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QABA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCF
PSCF Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PSCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QABA vs. PSCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QABAPSCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.32

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.34

6.18

-0.84

QABA vs. PSCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QABA Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the PSCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QABA and PSCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QABA vs. PSCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QABA drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, which is greater than PSCF's maximum drawdown of -45.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QABA and PSCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QABAPSCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.30%

-45.46%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-9.91%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.82%

-24.34%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.93%

-36.77%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.30%

-45.46%

-3.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.40%

-8.57%

-2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

3.71%

+1.28%

Volatility

QABA vs. PSCF - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) at 4.70%. This indicates that QABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QABAPSCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

4.70%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.48%

11.99%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

17.54%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.39%

22.42%

+3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.64%

24.77%

+3.87%

QABA vs. PSCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QABA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCF's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QABA vs. PSCF - Dividend Comparison

QABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, which matches PSCF's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
2.22%2.09%2.48%3.32%2.93%1.83%3.57%4.27%4.21%2.26%3.01%2.37%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
2.22%2.52%2.37%2.71%2.10%1.68%2.55%1.95%1.90%1.42%1.13%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


QABA and PSCF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QABA has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to PSCF (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QABA dropped -49.30% vs PSCF's -45.46%.

On 10-year performance, QABA leads with 8.33% vs 7.98% for PSCF. On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QABA has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QABA.

QABA and PSCF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.22%.

QABA tracks NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index, while PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QABA and 0.29% for PSCF.

PSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QABA and PSCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer