QABA vs. DFNL
QABA (First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund) and DFNL (Davis Select Financial ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. QABA is passively managed, while DFNL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QABA returned 3.09%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for DFNL. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QABA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for DFNL.
Performance
QABA vs. DFNL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QABA achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly higher than DFNL's -5.82% return.
QABA
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 7.37%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
DFNL
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -5.82%
- 6M
- -1.79%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
QABA vs. DFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 8.16% | 4.62% | 14.49% | -2.18% | -9.01% | 34.20% | -10.70% | 22.85% | -16.47% | 2.78% |
DFNL Davis Select Financial ETF | -5.82% | 28.59% | 28.56% | 14.45% | -8.45% | 31.25% | -4.97% | 27.37% | -11.59% | 20.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between QABA and DFNL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between QABA and DFNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
QABA vs. DFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QABA
DFNL
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
QABA
DFNL
Industrials
QABA
DFNL
Basic Materials
QABA
-
DFNL
-
Communication Services
QABA
-
DFNL
-
Consumer Cyclical
QABA
-
DFNL
Consumer Defensive
QABA
-
DFNL
-
Energy
QABA
-
DFNL
-
Healthcare
QABA
-
DFNL
-
Real Estate
QABA
-
DFNL
-
Technology
QABA
-
DFNL
Utilities
QABA
-
DFNL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QABA vs. DFNL — Risk / Return Rank
QABA
DFNL
QABA vs. DFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QABA | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.15 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 0.97 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 2.84 | +0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QABA | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.53 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.51 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
QABA vs. DFNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QABA drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, which is greater than DFNL's maximum drawdown of -44.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QABA and DFNL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QABA | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.30% | -44.51% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -12.94% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | -16.05% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.93% | -26.27% | -16.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -8.54% | +4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -7.66% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 4.43% | +0.59% |
Volatility
QABA vs. DFNL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) at 3.93%. This indicates that QABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QABA | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 3.93% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.22% | 11.22% | +4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.50% | 14.68% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.50% | 19.33% | +7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 22.62% | +6.07% |
QABA vs. DFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QABA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
QABA vs. DFNL - Dividend Comparison
QABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than DFNL's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNL Davis Select Financial ETF | 1.45% | 1.37% | 2.19% | 2.33% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 1.45% | 2.52% | 3.12% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 2.40% | 2.52% | 2.37% | 2.71% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 1.90% | 1.42% | 1.13% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QABA and DFNL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QABA has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to DFNL (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QABA dropped -49.30% vs DFNL's -44.51%.
On 5-year performance, DFNL leads with 10.20% vs 3.09% for QABA. On fees, QABA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DFNL has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFNL has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 3.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QABA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for DFNL.
QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.45% for DFNL.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Davis Advisers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QABA and 0.64% for DFNL.
DFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QABA and DFNL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer