PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QABA vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QABA vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QABA achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, QABA has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 6.80%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


QABA

1D
-2.39%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
8.16%
6M
7.37%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
6.80%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QABA vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
8.16%4.62%14.49%-2.18%-9.01%34.20%-10.70%22.85%-16.47%0.75%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QABA and DBO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

0.23

The correlation between QABA and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QABA vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QABA
DBO

Financial Services

99.7%
116.0%

Industrials

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

QABA
99.7%
DBO
116.0%

Industrials

QABA
0.3%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

QABA

-

DBO

-

Communication Services

QABA

-

DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

QABA

-

DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

QABA

-

DBO

-

Energy

QABA

-

DBO

-

Healthcare

QABA

-

DBO

-

Real Estate

QABA

-

DBO

-

Technology

QABA

-

DBO

-

Utilities

QABA

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QABA vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QABA
QABA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QABA Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
QABA Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QABA vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QABADBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.38

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

4.44

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

9.02

-5.33

QABA vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QABA Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QABA and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QABADBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.34

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.50

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.36

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.02

+0.32

Drawdowns

QABA vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QABA drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QABA and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QABADBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.30%

-90.18%

+40.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-18.19%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.82%

-28.20%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.93%

-37.68%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.30%

-61.69%

+12.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-51.38%

+47.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-62.25%

+50.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

8.92%

-3.90%

Volatility

QABA vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) is 5.63%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that QABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QABADBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

12.61%

-6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

28.20%

-12.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.50%

34.46%

-11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.50%

32.29%

-5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.69%

31.78%

-3.09%

QABA vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QABA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

QABA vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

QABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
2.40%2.52%2.37%2.71%2.10%1.68%2.55%1.95%1.90%1.42%1.13%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


QABA and DBO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to QABA (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QABA dropped -49.30% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs 6.80% for QABA. On fees, QABA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QABA has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QABA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

QABA is categorized as Financials Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. QABA tracks NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QABA and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QABA and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer