PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QABA vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QABA vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QABA achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.12% return.


QABA

1D
1.62%
1M
0.70%
YTD
10.82%
6M
12.24%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
7.05%

AVUV

1D
0.92%
1M
1.01%
YTD
19.12%
6M
20.66%
1Y
39.89%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QABA vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
10.82%4.62%14.49%-2.18%-9.01%34.20%-10.70%9.21%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
19.12%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QABA and AVUV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.84

The correlation between QABA and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

QABA vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QABA
AVUV

Financial Services

99.7%
25.8%

Industrials

0.3%
13.9%

Basic Materials

-

4.9%

Communication Services

-

2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

18.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

18.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

-

7.0%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Financial Services

QABA
99.7%
AVUV
25.8%

Industrials

QABA
0.3%
AVUV
13.9%

Basic Materials

QABA

-

AVUV
4.9%

Communication Services

QABA

-

AVUV
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QABA

-

AVUV
18.0%

Consumer Defensive

QABA

-

AVUV
4.5%

Energy

QABA

-

AVUV
18.2%

Healthcare

QABA

-

AVUV
4.2%

Real Estate

QABA

-

AVUV
0.7%

Technology

QABA

-

AVUV
7.0%

Utilities

QABA

-

AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QABA vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QABA
QABA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
QABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
QABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QABA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QABA vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QABAAVUVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

2.29

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

3.26

-1.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.40

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

4.99

-3.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.33

14.84

-10.51

QABA vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QABA Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QABA and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QABAAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.29

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.48

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.56

-0.22

Drawdowns

QABA vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QABA drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, roughly equal to the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QABA and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QABAAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.30%

-49.42%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-7.95%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.82%

-28.79%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.93%

-28.79%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-0.15%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-7.96%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

2.67%

+2.34%

Volatility

QABA vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.14%. This indicates that QABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QABAAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

4.14%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

11.28%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.40%

17.50%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.47%

22.73%

+3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.69%

28.30%

+0.39%

QABA vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QABA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

QABA vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

QABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than AVUV's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.28%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
2.34%2.52%2.37%2.71%2.10%1.68%2.55%1.95%1.90%1.42%1.13%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


QABA and AVUV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QABA has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to AVUV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QABA dropped -49.30% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.93% vs 3.56% for QABA. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QABA.

QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.28% for AVUV.

QABA is categorized as Financials Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QABA and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QABA and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer