PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QABA vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QABA vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QABA having a 23.18% return and AVUV slightly higher at 23.62%.


QABA

1D
0.11%
1M
2.02%
6M
16.07%
YTD
23.18%
1Y
33.48%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
8.38%
ALL TIME*
9.66%

AVUV

1D
0.03%
1M
1.43%
6M
15.37%
YTD
23.62%
1Y
40.65%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$143.14M$148.43M$155.85M
$803.45K$564.12K$491.36K

QABA vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
23.18%4.62%14.49%-2.18%-9.01%34.20%-10.70%7.54%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
23.62%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QABA and AVUV is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.84

The correlation between QABA and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

QABA vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QABA
AVUV

Financial Services

99.7%
27.8%

Industrials

0.3%
13.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Communication Services

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

18.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

13.9%

Healthcare

-

5.3%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

-

7.4%

Utilities

-

0.2%

Financial Services

QABA
99.7%
AVUV
27.8%

Industrials

QABA
0.3%
AVUV
13.5%

Basic Materials

QABA

-

AVUV
4.8%

Communication Services

QABA

-

AVUV
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QABA

-

AVUV
18.5%

Consumer Defensive

QABA

-

AVUV
4.9%

Energy

QABA

-

AVUV
13.9%

Healthcare

QABA

-

AVUV
5.3%

Real Estate

QABA

-

AVUV
0.7%

Technology

QABA

-

AVUV
7.4%

Utilities

QABA

-

AVUV
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QABA vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QABA
QABA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QABA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QABA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QABA vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QABAAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

4.74

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

14.98

-8.49

QABA vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QABA Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QABA and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QABA vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QABA drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, roughly equal to the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QABA and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QABAAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.30%

-49.42%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-7.95%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.82%

-28.79%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.93%

-28.79%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-0.72%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-7.78%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

2.52%

+2.24%

Volatility

QABA vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 2.88%. This indicates that QABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QABAAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

2.88%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

10.51%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.01%

16.90%

+5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.22%

22.40%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.59%

28.02%

+0.57%

QABA vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QABA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

QABA vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

QABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than AVUV's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.25%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
2.22%2.52%2.37%2.71%2.10%1.68%2.55%1.95%1.90%1.42%1.13%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


QABA and AVUV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QABA has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to AVUV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QABA dropped -49.30% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 13.16% vs 8.03% for QABA. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QABA.

QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.25% for AVUV.

QABA is categorized as Financials Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QABA and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QABA and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer