PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZVEX vs. WAEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZVEX vs. WAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund (PZVEX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZVEX achieves a 16.97% return, which is significantly lower than WAEMX's 24.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PZVEX has outperformed WAEMX with an annualized return of 12.35%, while WAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.47% annualized return.


PZVEX

1D
1.13%
1M
3.12%
YTD
16.97%
6M
18.36%
1Y
43.65%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
12.35%

WAEMX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
24.12%
6M
28.17%
1Y
35.26%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZVEX vs. WAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZVEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund
16.97%35.06%4.11%20.32%-6.03%6.41%8.01%13.17%-10.59%29.88%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
24.12%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%32.79%27.45%-18.97%38.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PZVEX and WAEMX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.58

The correlation between PZVEX and WAEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZVEX vs. WAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZVEX
PZVEX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PZVEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZVEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZVEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PZVEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZVEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZVEX vs. WAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund (PZVEX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZVEXWAEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.36

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

4.49

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

13.90

-2.27

PZVEX vs. WAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZVEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the WAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZVEX and WAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZVEXWAEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

2.03

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.11

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.47

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.30

+0.30

Drawdowns

PZVEX vs. WAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZVEX drawdown since its inception was -45.00%, smaller than the maximum WAEMX drawdown of -66.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZVEX and WAEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZVEXWAEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.00%

-66.35%

+21.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-7.89%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.52%

-25.56%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.73%

-44.88%

+19.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.00%

-44.88%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-8.18%

+5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-16.81%

+7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

2.54%

+1.28%

Volatility

PZVEX vs. WAEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund (PZVEX) is 4.46%, while Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that PZVEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZVEXWAEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

5.82%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

14.64%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

17.48%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

17.73%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.34%

18.19%

-2.85%

PZVEX vs. WAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZVEX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is lower than WAEMX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZVEX vs. WAEMX - Dividend Comparison

PZVEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than WAEMX's 56.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZVEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund
3.92%4.58%7.03%5.49%1.80%2.46%1.08%6.07%0.97%1.24%0.71%1.90%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
56.72%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZVEX and WAEMX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAEMX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to PZVEX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZVEX dropped -45.00% vs WAEMX's -66.35%.

PZVEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZVEX and WAEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer