PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYVLX vs. YAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYVLX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYVLX achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 30.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PYVLX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 9.85%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.


PYVLX

1D
0.92%
1M
3.00%
YTD
9.82%
6M
10.00%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.85%

YAFFX

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.70%
YTD
30.77%
6M
14.70%
1Y
28.89%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYVLX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYVLX
Payden Equity Income Fund
9.82%11.41%15.94%5.37%-6.68%23.39%0.77%27.95%-6.69%15.71%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
30.77%3.89%9.30%16.53%-8.20%16.48%17.22%19.21%2.99%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PYVLX and YAFFX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 1997

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between PYVLX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYVLX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYVLX
PYVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PYVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PYVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYVLX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYVLXYAFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

1.71

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.29

6.17

+8.11

PYVLX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYVLX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYVLXYAFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

1.32

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.58

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.78

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.62

-0.22

Drawdowns

PYVLX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.67%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYVLX and YAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYVLXYAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.67%

-43.80%

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-17.08%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-18.88%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-21.31%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.24%

-30.62%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.48%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-6.21%

-4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

4.70%

-3.20%

Volatility

PYVLX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) is 2.61%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that PYVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYVLXYAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

6.13%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

22.29%

-14.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.64%

22.19%

-12.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

18.10%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

16.53%

-0.01%

PYVLX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYVLX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYVLX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

PYVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYVLX
Payden Equity Income Fund
5.94%6.38%17.91%2.94%6.72%20.13%1.88%4.97%2.98%7.10%3.25%2.50%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
0.00%0.00%18.44%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYVLX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to PYVLX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYVLX dropped -60.67% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

PYVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYVLX and YAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer