PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYVLX vs. PYGNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYVLX vs. PYGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) and Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYVLX achieves a 8.69% return, which is significantly higher than PYGNX's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PYVLX has outperformed PYGNX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while PYGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.79% annualized return.


PYVLX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
8.69%
6M
8.93%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
9.72%

PYGNX

1D
0.26%
1M
0.99%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.05%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*
0.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYVLX vs. PYGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYVLX
Payden Equity Income Fund
8.69%11.41%15.94%5.37%-6.68%23.39%0.77%27.95%-6.69%15.71%
PYGNX
Payden GNMA Fund
0.86%7.54%0.84%3.93%-12.54%-2.26%4.27%5.67%0.37%1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PYVLX and PYGNX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 1999

-0.07

The correlation between PYVLX and PYGNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYVLX vs. PYGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYVLX
PYVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PYVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PYVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PYGNX
PYGNX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PYGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYVLX vs. PYGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) and Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYVLXPYGNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

1.75

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

5.41

+8.02

PYVLX vs. PYGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the PYGNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYVLX and PYGNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYVLX vs. PYGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.67%, which is greater than PYGNX's maximum drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYVLX and PYGNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYVLXPYGNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.67%

-19.64%

-41.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-3.40%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-8.09%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-18.72%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.24%

-19.64%

-13.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-2.93%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.44%

-2.31%

-8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.10%

+0.43%

Volatility

PYVLX vs. PYGNX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX) at 1.37%. This indicates that PYVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYVLXPYGNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

1.37%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

3.28%

+4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.94%

4.28%

+5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

6.43%

+10.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

4.88%

+11.65%

PYVLX vs. PYGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYVLX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than PYGNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYVLX vs. PYGNX - Dividend Comparison

PYVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than PYGNX's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYGNX
Payden GNMA Fund
3.92%3.80%3.63%2.64%3.70%2.74%2.80%3.34%3.26%3.24%3.07%3.59%
PYVLX
Payden Equity Income Fund
6.00%6.38%17.91%2.94%6.72%20.13%1.88%4.97%2.98%7.10%3.25%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYVLX and PYGNX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYVLX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PYGNX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYVLX dropped -60.67% vs PYGNX's -19.64%.

PYVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYVLX and PYGNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer