PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYVLX vs. PYCBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYVLX vs. PYCBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) and Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYVLX achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than PYCBX's 0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PYVLX has outperformed PYCBX with an annualized return of 9.75%, while PYCBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.08% annualized return.


PYVLX

1D
-0.65%
1M
1.60%
YTD
8.81%
6M
9.61%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
9.75%

PYCBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.52%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
2.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYVLX vs. PYCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYVLX
Payden Equity Income Fund
8.81%11.41%15.94%5.37%-6.68%23.39%0.77%27.95%-6.69%15.71%
PYCBX
Payden Core Bond Fund
0.28%7.69%2.55%6.57%-13.55%-1.00%6.93%9.27%-1.26%5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PYVLX and PYCBX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

-0.09

The correlation between PYVLX and PYCBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYVLX vs. PYCBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYVLX
PYVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PYVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PYVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PYCBX
PYCBX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PYCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PYCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYVLX vs. PYCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) and Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYVLXPYCBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

1.52

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

2.27

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

2.02

+1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.96

6.02

+7.93

PYVLX vs. PYCBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the PYCBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYVLX and PYCBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYVLXPYCBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.52

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.09

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.44

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.95

-0.55

Drawdowns

PYVLX vs. PYCBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.67%, which is greater than PYCBX's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYVLX and PYCBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYVLXPYCBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.67%

-18.59%

-42.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-2.97%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-6.23%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-18.59%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.24%

-18.59%

-14.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.59%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-2.41%

-8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.00%

+0.50%

Volatility

PYVLX vs. PYCBX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to Payden Core Bond Fund (PYCBX) at 1.34%. This indicates that PYVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYVLXPYCBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

1.34%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.42%

2.78%

+4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.62%

3.81%

+5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

5.73%

+10.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

4.70%

+11.82%

PYVLX vs. PYCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYVLX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than PYCBX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYVLX vs. PYCBX - Dividend Comparison

PYVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than PYCBX's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYCBX
Payden Core Bond Fund
4.57%4.78%4.63%3.76%3.21%2.39%3.96%3.04%3.27%3.13%3.85%2.84%
PYVLX
Payden Equity Income Fund
6.00%6.38%17.91%2.94%6.72%20.13%1.88%4.97%2.98%7.10%3.25%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYVLX and PYCBX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYVLX has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to PYCBX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYVLX dropped -60.67% vs PYCBX's -18.59%.

PYVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYVLX and PYCBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer