PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYELX vs. VEMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYELX vs. VEMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares (VEMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYELX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than VEMBX's 3.36% return.


PYELX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.89%
1Y
8.42%
3Y*
34.36%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
10.22%

VEMBX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.44%
YTD
3.36%
6M
3.45%
1Y
11.88%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYELX vs. VEMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
0.48%139.58%-3.48%13.16%-11.28%-7.83%1.79%13.92%-8.16%15.38%
VEMBX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares
3.36%14.32%7.38%13.66%-13.18%-1.53%14.99%17.72%-0.89%13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PYELX and VEMBX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.55

The correlation between PYELX and VEMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYELX vs. VEMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYELX
PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMBX
VEMBX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VEMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYELX vs. VEMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares (VEMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYELXVEMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.57

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

3.23

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

14.21

-10.39

PYELX vs. VEMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the VEMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYELX and VEMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYELX vs. VEMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYELX drawdown since its inception was -35.29%, which is greater than VEMBX's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYELX and VEMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYELXVEMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.29%

-24.36%

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-3.77%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.49%

-5.56%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.24%

-24.36%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-0.19%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-3.85%

-12.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

0.85%

+1.42%

Volatility

PYELX vs. VEMBX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares (VEMBX) at 1.14%. This indicates that PYELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYELXVEMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

1.14%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

3.65%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.76%

4.37%

+2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.35%

6.37%

+38.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.70%

6.35%

+26.35%

PYELX vs. VEMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYELX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VEMBX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYELX vs. VEMBX - Dividend Comparison

PYELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than VEMBX's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
7.24%6.28%7.08%5.38%5.93%5.36%4.69%5.46%6.67%6.15%5.44%5.26%
VEMBX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares
5.97%6.20%6.86%7.06%5.43%5.00%4.50%6.27%4.81%6.50%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYELX and VEMBX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYELX has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to VEMBX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYELX dropped -35.29% vs VEMBX's -24.36%.

VEMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYELX and VEMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer