PXSGX vs. VIMCX
PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) and VIMCX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - PXSGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus, while VIMCX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, PXSGX returned 10.50%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for VIMCX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXSGX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for VIMCX.
Performance
PXSGX vs. VIMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than VIMCX's 2.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PXSGX having a 10.50% annualized return and VIMCX not far ahead at 10.67%.
PXSGX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- 9.38%
- 6M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- -17.21%
- 3Y*
- -1.91%
- 5Y*
- -4.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
VIMCX
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- 6M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- -0.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
PXSGX vs. VIMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -0.23% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | 2.68% | 0.72% | 5.20% | 22.64% | -19.75% | 25.28% | 26.11% | 31.74% | -4.18% | 24.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and VIMCX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PXSGX and VIMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. VIMCX — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
VIMCX
PXSGX vs. VIMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXSGX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.02 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 0.03 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 0.07 | -1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. VIMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, which is greater than VIMCX's maximum drawdown of -33.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and VIMCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -33.92% | -19.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.07% | -12.14% | -15.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.49% | -20.32% | -22.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | -28.42% | -14.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | -33.92% | -8.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.17% | -4.02% | -30.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -4.89% | -7.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.29% | 4.96% | +12.33% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. VIMCX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) at 4.48%. This indicates that PXSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | VIMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 4.48% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.41% | 12.65% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 16.29% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 18.23% | +6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 18.65% | +3.94% |
PXSGX vs. VIMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VIMCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. VIMCX - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.02%, more than VIMCX's 4.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 48.02% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | 4.30% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 2.36% | 0.23% | 1.58% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXSGX and VIMCX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXSGX has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to VIMCX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXSGX dropped -53.72% vs VIMCX's -33.92%.
VIMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXSGX and VIMCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer