PXSGX vs. SCATX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX).
PXSGX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Jun 28, 2006. SCATX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 23, 2004.
Performance
PXSGX vs. SCATX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PXSGX vs. SCATX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -9.88% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
SCATX Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund | -14.67% | 10.22% | 35.81% | 65.58% | -55.30% | -9.93% | 119.67% | 37.02% | 10.84% | 34.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -9.88% return, which is significantly higher than SCATX's -14.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PXSGX has underperformed SCATX with an annualized return of 9.92%, while SCATX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.
PXSGX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -9.88%
- 6M
- -15.97%
- 1Y
- -23.38%
- 3Y*
- -3.82%
- 5Y*
- -5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
SCATX
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- -14.67%
- 6M
- -16.94%
- 1Y
- 9.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- -1.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PXSGX vs. SCATX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCATX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. SCATX — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
SCATX
PXSGX vs. SCATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXSGX | SCATX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | 0.35 | -1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | 0.73 | -2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.09 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 0.34 | -1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 1.04 | -2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXSGX | SCATX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 0.35 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | -0.05 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.46 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.39 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and SCATX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. SCATX - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.16%, while SCATX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 53.16% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
SCATX Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.18% | 10.09% | 18.59% | 7.30% |
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. SCATX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, smaller than the maximum SCATX drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and SCATX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | SCATX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -66.92% | +13.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.55% | -26.17% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | -63.68% | +21.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | -66.92% | +24.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.54% | -27.51% | -13.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -15.85% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.74% | 8.63% | +4.11% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. SCATX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) is 5.59%, while Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Growth Stock Fund (SCATX) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that PXSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | SCATX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 9.54% | -3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 18.69% | -5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 29.77% | -7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 36.26% | -11.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 32.59% | -10.07% |