PXSGX vs. NEAIX
PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) and NEAIX (Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PXSGX returned -4.60%/yr vs 20.40%/yr for NEAIX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXSGX charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for NEAIX.
Performance
PXSGX vs. NEAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than NEAIX's 45.62% return.
PXSGX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- -18.26%
- 3Y*
- -2.07%
- 5Y*
- -4.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
NEAIX
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- 6M
- 34.72%
- YTD
- 45.62%
- 1Y
- 65.48%
- 3Y*
- 30.78%
- 5Y*
- 20.40%
- 10Y*
- —
PXSGX vs. NEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -2.14% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 45.62% | 26.99% | 14.86% | 38.37% | -27.02% | 38.46% | 52.49% | 44.68% | -15.64% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and NEAIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXSGX and NEAIX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. NEAIX — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
NEAIX
PXSGX vs. NEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXSGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.36 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 4.73 | -5.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 16.49 | -17.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. NEAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, which is greater than NEAIX's maximum drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and NEAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -35.93% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.07% | -13.98% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.49% | -28.21% | -14.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | -35.93% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.43% | -12.39% | -23.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -8.55% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.16% | 4.00% | +13.16% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. NEAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) is 5.26%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a volatility of 13.74%. This indicates that PXSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 13.74% | -8.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 24.77% | -11.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 29.43% | -10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 25.39% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 24.94% | -2.36% |
PXSGX vs. NEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. NEAIX - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.96%, more than NEAIX's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 1.38% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.84% | 3.80% | 10.42% | 16.35% | 5.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 48.96% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXSGX and NEAIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEAIX has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to PXSGX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXSGX dropped -53.72% vs NEAIX's -35.93%.
NEAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXSGX and NEAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer