PXSGX vs. ETEGX
PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) and ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PXSGX returned 10.48%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for ETEGX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXSGX charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ETEGX.
Performance
PXSGX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly lower than ETEGX's 7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PXSGX has outperformed ETEGX with an annualized return of 10.48%, while ETEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
PXSGX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- -5.55%
- 6M
- -7.42%
- 1Y
- -19.98%
- 3Y*
- -1.07%
- 5Y*
- -5.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
ETEGX
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
PXSGX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -5.55% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 7.19% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | -15.52% | 21.45% | 12.73% | 27.57% | -6.00% | 14.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and ETEGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2006 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PXSGX and ETEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
ETEGX
PXSGX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXSGX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.04 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 0.23 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 0.51 | -1.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, smaller than the maximum ETEGX drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and ETEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -67.58% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.37% | -13.05% | -15.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.49% | -19.98% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | -24.30% | -18.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | -36.66% | -5.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.68% | -5.35% | -32.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -22.73% | +10.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.91% | 5.90% | +11.01% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) at 4.79%. This indicates that PXSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 4.79% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 11.53% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 16.27% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 18.80% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 19.84% | +2.76% |
PXSGX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.72%, more than ETEGX's 7.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 7.68% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 50.72% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXSGX and ETEGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXSGX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to ETEGX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXSGX dropped -53.72% vs ETEGX's -67.58%.
ETEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXSGX and ETEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer