PXSGX vs. DMCRX
PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) and DMCRX (Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PXSGX returned 10.28%/yr vs 21.92%/yr for DMCRX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXSGX charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for DMCRX.
Performance
PXSGX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 27.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PXSGX has underperformed DMCRX with an annualized return of 10.28%, while DMCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.92% annualized return.
PXSGX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- -18.26%
- 3Y*
- -2.07%
- 5Y*
- -4.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
DMCRX
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 19.60%
- YTD
- 27.51%
- 1Y
- 70.43%
- 3Y*
- 28.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 21.92%
PXSGX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -2.14% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 27.51% | 31.17% | 30.58% | 11.47% | -33.54% | 22.23% | 86.43% | 34.03% | 2.52% | 24.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and DMCRX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXSGX and DMCRX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
DMCRX
PXSGX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXSGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.39 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 4.86 | -5.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 16.72 | -17.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, which is greater than DMCRX's maximum drawdown of -46.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and DMCRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -46.68% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.07% | -15.46% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.49% | -34.92% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | -46.68% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | -46.68% | +4.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.43% | -4.84% | -30.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -14.74% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.16% | 4.48% | +12.68% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) is 5.26%, while Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that PXSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 9.11% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 22.91% | -9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 29.96% | -11.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 28.74% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 28.03% | -5.45% |
PXSGX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.96%, more than DMCRX's 10.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 10.76% | 13.72% | 3.86% | 0.87% | 8.20% | 48.23% | 19.79% | 14.70% | 33.22% | 8.91% | 0.00% | 4.20% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 48.96% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXSGX and DMCRX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DMCRX has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to PXSGX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXSGX dropped -53.72% vs DMCRX's -46.68%.
DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXSGX and DMCRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer