PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF (PXC.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXC.TO achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 7.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PXC.TO has outperformed ZLB.TO with an annualized return of 13.41%, while ZLB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.


PXC.TO

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
17.12%
6M
12.82%
1Y
36.76%
3Y*
25.64%
5Y*
16.75%
10Y*
13.41%

ZLB.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
2.74%
YTD
7.81%
6M
3.71%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
10.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXC.TO
Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF
17.12%26.50%19.57%9.28%1.37%34.11%-1.11%19.11%-9.11%7.15%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
7.81%20.40%15.31%9.41%-0.35%22.93%1.51%21.92%-2.76%11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PXC.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012

0.50

The correlation between PXC.TO and ZLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXC.TO
ZLB.TO

Financial Services

34.7%
24.4%

Energy

26.6%

-

Basic Materials

13.0%
6.1%

Industrials

7.2%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
8.2%

Utilities

3.1%
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
18.2%

Communication Services

2.7%
9.9%

Technology

2.2%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.8%
4.2%

Healthcare

0.2%

-

Financial Services

PXC.TO
34.7%
ZLB.TO
24.4%

Energy

PXC.TO
26.6%
ZLB.TO

-

Basic Materials

PXC.TO
13.0%
ZLB.TO
6.1%

Industrials

PXC.TO
7.2%
ZLB.TO
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PXC.TO
6.6%
ZLB.TO
8.2%

Utilities

PXC.TO
3.1%
ZLB.TO
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

PXC.TO
2.9%
ZLB.TO
18.2%

Communication Services

PXC.TO
2.7%
ZLB.TO
9.9%

Technology

PXC.TO
2.2%
ZLB.TO
1.9%

Real Estate

PXC.TO
0.8%
ZLB.TO
4.2%

Healthcare

PXC.TO
0.2%
ZLB.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXC.TO
PXC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PXC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PXC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ZLB.TO
ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF (PXC.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXC.TOZLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.29

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.95

2.54

+5.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.61

7.44

+24.17

PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is higher than the ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXC.TO and ZLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.78%, which is greater than ZLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXC.TO and ZLB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXC.TOZLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.78%

-33.96%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-5.67%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.99%

-8.01%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.75%

-13.00%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.78%

-33.96%

-7.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

0.00%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-2.48%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.93%

-0.76%

Volatility

PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF (PXC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 2.41%. This indicates that PXC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXC.TOZLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.41%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

7.73%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

9.30%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

9.64%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

12.22%

+4.19%

Dividends

PXC.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

PXC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than ZLB.TO's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXC.TO
Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF
2.27%2.65%3.17%3.48%3.42%2.58%3.10%2.92%2.86%2.23%2.57%3.13%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
1.84%1.99%2.37%2.67%2.66%2.39%2.83%2.44%2.76%2.55%2.94%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXC.TO and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXC.TO and ZLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer