PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWDIX vs. QSTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWDIX vs. QSTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund (PWDIX) and Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWDIX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than QSTFX's 25.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PWDIX has underperformed QSTFX with an annualized return of 5.58%, while QSTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return.


PWDIX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
10.26%
6M
9.95%
1Y
23.50%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
5.58%

QSTFX

1D
4.68%
1M
6.42%
YTD
25.79%
6M
24.62%
1Y
57.88%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWDIX vs. QSTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWDIX
Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund
10.26%17.73%12.33%-0.18%-9.83%31.54%-6.54%-2.84%-7.97%11.41%
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
25.79%-2.48%29.94%61.87%-46.15%28.79%78.20%16.43%-6.86%68.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PWDIX and QSTFX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2015

0.37

The correlation between PWDIX and QSTFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWDIX vs. QSTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWDIX
PWDIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PWDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PWDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

QSTFX
QSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWDIX vs. QSTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund (PWDIX) and Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWDIXQSTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

3.17

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

8.09

+5.31

PWDIX vs. QSTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWDIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the QSTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWDIX and QSTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWDIX vs. QSTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWDIX drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, smaller than the maximum QSTFX drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWDIX and QSTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWDIXQSTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.86%

-49.03%

+8.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.44%

-17.87%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-32.22%

+15.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

-49.03%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

-49.03%

+8.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-1.34%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-15.42%

+6.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

6.98%

-5.18%

Volatility

PWDIX vs. QSTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund (PWDIX) is 3.92%, while Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that PWDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWDIXQSTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

8.98%

-5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

20.15%

-12.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

26.25%

-15.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

27.28%

-13.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

28.02%

-13.49%

PWDIX vs. QSTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWDIX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QSTFX's 1.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWDIX vs. QSTFX - Dividend Comparison

PWDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than QSTFX's 8.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWDIX
Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund
1.83%1.22%2.16%1.75%1.29%2.31%3.66%3.10%30.58%3.25%1.45%3.55%
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
8.47%10.65%5.12%1.03%0.00%21.93%20.82%0.52%2.57%39.11%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWDIX and QSTFX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSTFX has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to PWDIX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWDIX dropped -40.86% vs QSTFX's -49.03%.

QSTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWDIX and QSTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer