PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVQNX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVQNX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVQNX achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.09% return.


PVQNX

1D
1.61%
1M
-0.41%
6M
6.71%
YTD
9.61%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
10.59%
ALL TIME*
9.49%

PADLX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.35%
6M
2.77%
YTD
4.09%
1Y
9.96%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PVQNX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PVQNX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund
9.61%19.82%13.19%19.01%-17.27%17.71%13.93%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.09%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PVQNX and PADLX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.86

The correlation between PVQNX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVQNX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PVQNX
PVQNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PVQNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVQNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVQNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PVQNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVQNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PVQNX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PVQNXPADLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.75

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

11.56

-1.92

PVQNX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVQNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVQNX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PVQNX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVQNX drawdown since its inception was -30.68%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVQNX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVQNXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-18.87%

-11.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-3.63%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-6.63%

-6.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.30%

-18.87%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-0.79%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-4.73%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

0.86%

+1.10%

Volatility

PVQNX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.44%. This indicates that PVQNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVQNXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

1.44%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

4.03%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

4.89%

+6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

6.70%

+6.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

7.47%

+6.78%

PVQNX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVQNX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PVQNX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

PVQNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than PADLX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.65%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PVQNX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund
4.79%4.23%4.22%2.37%2.62%5.08%1.41%3.82%6.65%2.10%2.43%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PVQNX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PVQNX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PADLX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVQNX dropped -30.68% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVQNX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer