PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVQNX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVQNX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVQNX achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PVQNX has outperformed FFGZX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while FFGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.25% annualized return.


PVQNX

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.16%
YTD
10.85%
6M
11.51%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
11.16%

FFGZX

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.19%
YTD
3.95%
6M
4.10%
1Y
9.74%
3Y*
7.57%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
4.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVQNX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PVQNX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund
10.85%19.82%13.19%19.01%-17.27%17.71%13.93%24.43%-7.44%19.64%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.95%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PVQNX and FFGZX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.75

The correlation between PVQNX and FFGZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (5 years) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVQNX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVQNX
PVQNX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PVQNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVQNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVQNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PVQNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVQNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVQNX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PVQNXFFGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.08

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.18

13.76

+0.43

PVQNX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVQNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVQNX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PVQNXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.55

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.62

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.96

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.93

-0.23

Drawdowns

PVQNX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVQNX drawdown since its inception was -30.68%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVQNX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVQNXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-14.94%

-15.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-3.33%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-4.76%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.30%

-14.94%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.68%

-14.94%

-15.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.31%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-2.26%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.74%

+1.09%

Volatility

PVQNX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.52%. This indicates that PVQNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVQNXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

1.52%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

3.34%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

4.02%

+6.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

5.09%

+8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

4.43%

+9.82%

PVQNX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVQNX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PVQNX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

PVQNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than FFGZX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.22%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
PVQNX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund
4.07%4.23%4.22%2.37%2.62%5.08%1.41%3.82%6.65%2.10%2.43%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


PVQNX and FFGZX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PVQNX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to FFGZX (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVQNX dropped -30.68% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVQNX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer