PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVQNX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVQNX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVQNX achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 12.26% return.


PVQNX

1D
1.61%
1M
-0.41%
6M
6.71%
YTD
9.61%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
10.59%
ALL TIME*
9.49%

FDFPX

1D
2.29%
1M
-0.99%
6M
8.37%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PVQNX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PVQNX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund
9.61%19.82%13.19%19.01%-17.27%17.71%13.93%8.69%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
12.26%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PVQNX and FDFPX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.97

The correlation between PVQNX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVQNX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PVQNX
PVQNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PVQNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVQNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVQNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PVQNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVQNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PVQNX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PVQNXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.40

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

10.04

-0.40

PVQNX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVQNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVQNX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PVQNX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVQNX drawdown since its inception was -30.68%, roughly equal to the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVQNX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVQNXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-31.22%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-9.54%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-15.42%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.30%

-27.41%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-2.19%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-5.76%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.28%

-0.32%

Volatility

PVQNX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund (PVQNX) is 3.32%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that PVQNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVQNXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

4.37%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

12.20%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

14.21%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

15.34%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

17.21%

-2.96%

PVQNX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVQNX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PVQNX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

PVQNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FDFPX's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.81%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PVQNX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund
4.79%4.23%4.22%2.37%2.62%5.08%1.41%3.82%6.65%2.10%2.43%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PVQNX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDFPX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to PVQNX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVQNX dropped -30.68% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

PVQNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVQNX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer