PURZX vs. VRTPX
PURZX (PGIM Global Real Estate Fund) and VRTPX (Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, PURZX returned 2.02%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for VRTPX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PURZX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VRTPX.
Performance
PURZX vs. VRTPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PURZX achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly higher than VRTPX's 8.00% return.
PURZX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.90%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
VRTPX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- —
PURZX vs. VRTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PURZX PGIM Global Real Estate Fund | 8.43% | 9.22% | 3.64% | 11.24% | -26.73% | 27.91% | -4.39% | 20.60% | -5.32% | 2.99% |
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund | 8.00% | 2.22% | 3.72% | 13.17% | -26.14% | 40.37% | -4.65% | 28.96% | -5.99% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PURZX and VRTPX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PURZX and VRTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PURZX vs. VRTPX — Risk / Return Rank
PURZX
VRTPX
PURZX vs. VRTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX) and Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PURZX | VRTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.46 | 3.78 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PURZX | VRTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.76 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.11 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.25 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
PURZX vs. VRTPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PURZX drawdown since its inception was -69.49%, which is greater than VRTPX's maximum drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PURZX and VRTPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PURZX | VRTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.49% | -42.33% | -27.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.16% | -8.34% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | -18.19% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | -34.35% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.95% | -4.29% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.98% | -11.40% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.64% | +0.08% |
Volatility
PURZX vs. VRTPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX) is 3.60%, while Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that PURZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PURZX | VRTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 3.79% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 9.34% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 13.15% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 18.89% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 21.79% | -4.51% |
PURZX vs. VRTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PURZX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTPX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PURZX vs. VRTPX - Dividend Comparison
PURZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than VRTPX's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PURZX PGIM Global Real Estate Fund | 2.76% | 2.85% | 2.68% | 2.27% | 2.22% | 16.92% | 1.71% | 10.18% | 4.22% | 3.93% | 4.67% | 3.45% |
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.80% | 3.93% | 4.52% | 2.58% | 3.92% | 3.50% | 4.77% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, PURZX and VRTPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VRTPX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to PURZX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PURZX dropped -69.49% vs VRTPX's -42.33%.
PURZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PURZX and VRTPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer