PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (PUIP.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PUIP.L is traded in GBp, while VDPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDPA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUIP.L achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than VDPA.L's -0.44% return.


PUIP.L

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.05%
6M
-0.71%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
4.01%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
-0.67%
10Y*

VDPA.L

1D
-0.83%
1M
-1.23%
6M
-0.82%
YTD
-0.44%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PUIP.L
Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
-0.60%7.40%1.97%6.75%-16.40%-1.56%7.62%0.89%
VDPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
-0.44%0.11%4.61%2.66%-4.76%-0.27%5.94%-2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PUIP.L and VDPA.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUIP.L
PUIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PUIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PUIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VDPA.L
VDPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (PUIP.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUIP.LVDPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.09

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.70

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

1.73

+2.08

PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the VDPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUIP.L and VDPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUIP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, which is greater than VDPA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUIP.L and VDPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUIP.LVDPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-14.91%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-5.20%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.86%

-9.14%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.43%

-13.59%

-8.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-4.36%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-6.62%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

2.11%

-1.11%

Volatility

PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (PUIP.L) is 1.09%, while Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDPA.L) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that PUIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUIP.LVDPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

2.25%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

5.63%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63%

7.00%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.08%

9.14%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.99%

10.54%

-2.55%

PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUIP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VDPA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PUIP.L vs. VDPA.L - Dividend Comparison

PUIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, while VDPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
PUIP.L
Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
4.99%4.72%4.73%4.00%2.99%2.31%2.85%
VDPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUIP.L and VDPA.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDPA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDPA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for PUIP.L.

PUIP.L tracks Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged, while VDPA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PUIP.L and 0.07% for VDPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUIP.L and VDPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer