PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

PUIP.L (Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged) and PRIP.L (Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Corporate Bonds funds - PUIP.L tracks the Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged while PRIP.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PUIP.L returned -0.67%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PRIP.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PUIP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRIP.L.

Performance

PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (PUIP.L) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUIP.L achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly higher than PRIP.L's -1.01% return.

PUIP.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: -0.71%
• YTD: -0.60%
• 1Y: 4.01%
• 3Y*: 4.25%
• 5Y*: -0.67%
• 10Y*: —

PRIP.L

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -1.50%
• 6M: -1.17%
• YTD: -1.01%
• 1Y: 3.80%
• 3Y*: 3.68%
• 5Y*: 0.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PUIP.L Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged	-0.60%	7.40%	1.97%	6.75%	-16.40%	-1.56%	7.62%	0.89%
PRIP.L Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)	-1.01%	0.72%	3.72%	2.34%	-5.39%	-0.76%	6.78%	-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PUIP.L and PRIP.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019	0.43

The correlation between PUIP.L and PRIP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUIP.L

PUIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
PUIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PUIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PUIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PUIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
PUIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

PRIP.L

PRIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
PRIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PRIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PRIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PRIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
PRIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (PUIP.L) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PUIP.L	PRIP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	0.58	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	0.91	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.10	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	0.78	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	1.77	+2.04

PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the PRIP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUIP.L and PRIP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUIP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, smaller than the maximum PRIP.L drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUIP.L and PRIP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUIP.L	PRIP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.48%	-26.79%	+4.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-4.85%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.86%	-8.76%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.43%	-12.69%	-9.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.38%	-18.41%	+14.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.30%	-20.15%	+11.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	2.14%	-1.14%

Volatility

PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (PUIP.L) is 1.09%, while Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that PUIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUIP.L	PRIP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	2.21%	-1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.58%	4.84%	-1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.63%	6.50%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.08%	8.84%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.99%	12.07%	-4.08%

PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUIP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PUIP.L vs. PRIP.L - Dividend Comparison

PUIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than PRIP.L's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PRIP.L Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)	4.78%	4.73%	4.29%	4.10%	4.14%	3.33%	3.30%
PUIP.L Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged	4.99%	4.72%	4.73%	4.00%	2.99%	2.31%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PUIP.L and PRIP.L in my portfolio?

PUIP.L and PRIP.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PUIP.L or PRIP.L?

On fees, PRIP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PUIP.L or PRIP.L?

PRIP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for PUIP.L.

What is the main difference between PUIP.L and PRIP.L?

PUIP.L tracks Invesco USD IG Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF GBP Hedged, while PRIP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PUIP.L and 0.05% for PRIP.L.