PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUCZX vs. VFIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUCZX vs. VFIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z (PUCZX) and Vanguard GNMA Fund Investor Shares (VFIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUCZX achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly higher than VFIIX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PUCZX has outperformed VFIIX with an annualized return of 4.32%, while VFIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.31% annualized return.


PUCZX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.15%
1Y
6.89%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
4.32%

VFIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.89%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
1.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUCZX vs. VFIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUCZX
PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z
0.95%8.47%6.46%8.20%-13.74%0.05%6.28%14.89%1.09%7.48%
VFIIX
Vanguard GNMA Fund Investor Shares
0.79%7.73%1.07%5.17%-10.81%-1.24%3.73%5.84%0.89%1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PUCZX and VFIIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.61

Over the past year, PUCZX and VFIIX have become more correlated (0.91) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUCZX vs. VFIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUCZX
PUCZX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PUCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PUCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VFIIX
VFIIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VFIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VFIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUCZX vs. VFIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z (PUCZX) and Vanguard GNMA Fund Investor Shares (VFIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUCZXVFIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.25

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

7.47

+0.52

PUCZX vs. VFIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUCZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the VFIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUCZX and VFIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUCZXVFIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.60

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.08

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.28

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.64

+0.34

Drawdowns

PUCZX vs. VFIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUCZX drawdown since its inception was -18.60%, smaller than the maximum VFIIX drawdown of -25.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUCZX and VFIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUCZXVFIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.60%

-25.80%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.83%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.58%

-6.97%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.60%

-15.79%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.60%

-16.20%

-2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-1.38%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-2.98%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.85%

0.00%

Volatility

PUCZX vs. VFIIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z (PUCZX) and Vanguard GNMA Fund Investor Shares (VFIIX) have volatilities of 1.61% and 1.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUCZXVFIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

1.54%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

2.94%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

4.01%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.65%

6.21%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.72%

4.70%

+0.02%

PUCZX vs. VFIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUCZX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VFIIX's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUCZX vs. VFIIX - Dividend Comparison

PUCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than VFIIX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUCZX
PGIM Strategic Bond Fund Class Z
5.14%5.12%6.40%7.62%5.17%3.65%5.06%8.81%4.56%4.52%6.49%0.00%
VFIIX
Vanguard GNMA Fund Investor Shares
3.69%3.62%3.58%3.23%2.34%0.63%1.87%2.76%2.90%2.64%3.01%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PUCZX and VFIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PUCZX has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to VFIIX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUCZX dropped -18.60% vs VFIIX's -25.80%.

PUCZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUCZX and VFIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer