PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTUIX vs. PCGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTUIX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Total Return Fund IV (PTUIX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTUIX achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PTUIX has outperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 1.75%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.32% annualized return.


PTUIX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.57%
6M
-1.07%
YTD
-0.86%
1Y
2.25%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
1.75%
ALL TIME*
2.56%

PCGTX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.44%
6M
1.27%
YTD
1.44%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*
1.32%
ALL TIME*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PTUIX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTUIX
PIMCO Total Return Fund IV
-0.86%8.16%2.19%5.90%-13.84%-1.12%7.33%9.67%-0.76%4.57%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
1.44%7.84%0.98%5.12%-13.48%-0.61%5.75%6.55%0.17%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PTUIX and PCGTX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2011

0.80

The correlation between PTUIX and PCGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTUIX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTUIX
PTUIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PTUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PTUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PCGTX
PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTUIX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Total Return Fund IV (PTUIX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTUIXPCGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.24

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.11

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

5.78

-3.36

PTUIX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTUIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTUIX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTUIX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTUIX drawdown since its inception was -19.19%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTUIX and PCGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTUIXPCGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.19%

-19.34%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.38%

-3.09%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.04%

-6.80%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-19.19%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.19%

-19.34%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-2.82%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-1.85%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.10%

+0.19%

Volatility

PTUIX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Total Return Fund IV (PTUIX) is 1.03%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 1.53%. This indicates that PTUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTUIXPCGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

1.53%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.37%

4.76%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12%

5.66%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

7.22%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.15%

5.43%

-0.28%

PTUIX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTUIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTUIX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

PTUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than PCGTX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
4.25%3.78%5.36%5.02%3.67%2.87%3.23%3.53%3.34%2.96%2.71%2.21%
PTUIX
PIMCO Total Return Fund IV
3.90%4.09%4.21%2.78%2.74%1.84%2.24%2.78%2.53%1.75%2.96%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTUIX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to PTUIX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTUIX dropped -19.19% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTUIX and PCGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer