PTSHX vs. TMPFX
PTSHX (PIMCO Short Term Fund) and TMPFX (Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PTSHX returned 3.67%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for TMPFX. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTSHX charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TMPFX.
Performance
PTSHX vs. TMPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTSHX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than TMPFX's 1.52% return.
PTSHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.98%
TMPFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- —
PTSHX vs. TMPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTSHX PIMCO Short Term Fund | 1.92% | 4.88% | 6.43% | 6.09% | -0.55% | 0.02% | 2.75% | 2.74% | 1.51% |
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 1.52% | 3.71% | 4.26% | 3.90% | 0.51% | -0.91% | -0.60% | 0.30% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTSHX and TMPFX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2018 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTSHX vs. TMPFX — Risk / Return Rank
PTSHX
TMPFX
PTSHX vs. TMPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Short Term Fund (PTSHX) and Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTSHX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 77.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTSHX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42 | 6.81 | -3.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.63 | 1.15 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 0.81 | +0.90 |
Drawdowns
PTSHX vs. TMPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTSHX drawdown since its inception was -5.12%, which is greater than TMPFX's maximum drawdown of -3.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTSHX and TMPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTSHX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -3.52% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.21% | 0.00% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.41% | -3.52% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.33% | -3.52% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -0.65% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.00% | +0.06% |
Volatility
PTSHX vs. TMPFX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Short Term Fund (PTSHX) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) at 0.16%. This indicates that PTSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTSHX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 0.16% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.97% | 0.39% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44% | 0.56% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.40% | 2.33% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 1.81% | -0.46% |
PTSHX vs. TMPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTSHX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TMPFX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTSHX vs. TMPFX - Dividend Comparison
PTSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than TMPFX's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTSHX PIMCO Short Term Fund | 4.43% | 4.75% | 5.16% | 4.51% | 2.80% | 0.63% | 1.78% | 2.92% | 2.65% | 1.69% | 1.67% | 1.57% |
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 3.75% | 3.81% | 4.15% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTSHX and TMPFX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTSHX has higher volatility (0.39%) compared to TMPFX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTSHX dropped -5.12% vs TMPFX's -3.52%.
TMPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.81 vs 3.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTSHX and TMPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer