PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTMN vs. OXSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PTMN vs. OXSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Portman Ridge Finance Corporation (PTMN) and Oxford Square Capital Corp. (OXSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMN achieves a -33.65% return, which is significantly lower than OXSQ's -15.59% return.


PTMN

1D
-5.04%
1M
-6.93%
YTD
-33.65%
6M
-39.53%
1Y
-28.47%
3Y*
-16.02%
5Y*
-10.29%
10Y*
-1.14%

OXSQ

1D
-3.57%
1M
-29.35%
YTD
-15.59%
6M
-17.72%
1Y
-27.67%
3Y*
-7.44%
5Y*
-10.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMN vs. OXSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance Corporation
-33.65%-15.84%3.87%-8.99%3.80%43.54%7.18%-16.58%22.64%
OXSQ
Oxford Square Capital Corp.
-15.59%-13.32%-1.86%7.92%-14.37%47.13%-32.37%-4.32%16.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMN and OXSQ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PTMN:

$91.40M

OXSQ:

$119.18M

EPS

PTMN:

-$0.40

OXSQ:

-$0.45

PB Ratio

PTMN:

0.47

OXSQ:

0.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

PTMN:

$39.01M

OXSQ:

-$4.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PTMN:

-$6.07M

OXSQ:

-$11.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

PTMN:

$15.24M

OXSQ:

-$30.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTMN vs. OXSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMN
PTMN Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PTMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMN Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

OXSQ
OXSQ Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
OXSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OXSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
OXSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
OXSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
OXSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMN vs. OXSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portman Ridge Finance Corporation (PTMN) and Oxford Square Capital Corp. (OXSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTMNOXSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.88

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

-0.76

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

-1.75

+0.30

PTMN vs. OXSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the OXSQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMN and OXSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTMNOXSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

-0.74

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

-0.39

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

-0.10

+0.07

Drawdowns

PTMN vs. OXSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMN drawdown since its inception was -91.49%, which is greater than OXSQ's maximum drawdown of -67.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMN and OXSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTMNOXSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.49%

-67.11%

-24.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.57%

-36.46%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.72%

-43.85%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.72%

-47.48%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.46%

-45.14%

-11.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.72%

-21.03%

-14.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.75%

15.85%

+3.90%

Volatility

PTMN vs. OXSQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Portman Ridge Finance Corporation (PTMN) is 9.88%, while Oxford Square Capital Corp. (OXSQ) has a volatility of 23.75%. This indicates that PTMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OXSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTMNOXSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

23.75%

-13.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.97%

30.87%

-5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.21%

37.46%

-8.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

26.58%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.27%

35.29%

-3.02%

Dividends

PTMN vs. OXSQ - Dividend Comparison

PTMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.27%, less than OXSQ's 31.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OXSQ
Oxford Square Capital Corp.
31.11%23.86%17.21%17.66%13.46%10.29%20.07%14.76%9.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance Corporation
20.27%16.65%16.89%15.12%11.13%9.77%12.57%46.68%11.56%14.08%15.08%15.48%

Financials

PTMN vs. OXSQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Portman Ridge Finance Corporation and Oxford Square Capital Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00M-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M20222023202420252026
12.82M
-21.80M
(PTMN) Total Revenue
(OXSQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PTMN and OXSQ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OXSQ has higher volatility (23.75%) compared to PTMN (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMN dropped -91.49% vs OXSQ's -67.11%.

OXSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.74 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTMN and OXSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer