PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTLDX vs. GPICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTLDX vs. GPICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Low Duration Fund (PTLDX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLDX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than GPICX's 0.99% return.


PTLDX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.87%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
2.05%

GPICX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLDX vs. GPICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PTLDX
PIMCO Low Duration Fund
0.40%5.58%4.85%5.32%-5.69%-0.70%3.42%4.49%1.23%
GPICX
GuidepathConservative Income Fund
0.99%3.49%4.73%4.87%-1.67%0.08%-0.23%2.30%0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLDX and GPICX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2018

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTLDX vs. GPICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLDX
PTLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PTLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

GPICX
GPICX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GPICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPICX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GPICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPICX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLDX vs. GPICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Low Duration Fund (PTLDX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTLDXGPICXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

2.84

-1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

13.88

-11.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

69.49

-59.94

PTLDX vs. GPICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the GPICX Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLDX and GPICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTLDXGPICXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

4.17

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

2.21

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

1.80

-0.35

Drawdowns

PTLDX vs. GPICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.21%, which is greater than GPICX's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLDX and GPICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLDXGPICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-3.10%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-0.25%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.60%

-0.52%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.21%

-2.79%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-0.56%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.05%

+0.35%

Volatility

PTLDX vs. GPICX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Low Duration Fund (PTLDX) has a higher volatility of 0.63% compared to GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) at 0.27%. This indicates that PTLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLDXGPICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.27%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

0.62%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15%

0.83%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.49%

1.10%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.10%

1.06%

+1.04%

PTLDX vs. GPICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLDX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GPICX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTLDX vs. GPICX - Dividend Comparison

PTLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than GPICX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPICX
GuidepathConservative Income Fund
3.80%3.86%4.53%4.23%1.51%0.48%0.57%1.67%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTLDX
PIMCO Low Duration Fund
4.21%4.22%4.16%4.04%1.57%0.83%1.83%3.35%2.16%1.72%2.00%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTLDX and GPICX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTLDX has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to GPICX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLDX dropped -8.21% vs GPICX's -3.10%.

GPICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTLDX and GPICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer