PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTFSX vs. MUC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTFSX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Capital Tax Free Short Intermediate Securities Fund (PTFSX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PTFSX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUC

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.68%
YTD
4.06%
6M
3.70%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
-2.69%
10Y*
0.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTFSX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTFSX
Pacific Capital Tax Free Short Intermediate Securities Fund
-0.58%3.92%0.58%1.50%-2.71%-0.12%2.61%3.56%1.93%1.72%
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
4.06%5.96%0.76%7.86%-26.81%7.38%11.85%18.12%-9.00%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PTFSX and MUC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1998

0.23

The correlation between PTFSX and MUC shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTFSX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTFSX

MUC
MUC Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTFSX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Capital Tax Free Short Intermediate Securities Fund (PTFSX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PTFSX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTFSXMUCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

Drawdowns

PTFSX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTFSXMUCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

Volatility

PTFSX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTFSXMUCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.89%

PTFSX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTFSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTFSX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

PTFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than MUC's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
5.97%6.06%5.62%3.84%5.79%4.27%3.96%3.90%4.99%5.14%5.45%5.46%
PTFSX
Pacific Capital Tax Free Short Intermediate Securities Fund
1.20%1.87%1.82%1.39%1.05%1.06%1.40%1.81%2.21%1.62%1.66%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTFSX and MUC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTFSX and MUC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer