PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTEU vs. FSZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTEU vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTEU achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PTEU has underperformed FSZ with an annualized return of 4.25%, while FSZ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.42% annualized return.


PTEU

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.65%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.48%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
4.25%

FSZ

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.60%
YTD
2.04%
6M
6.03%
1Y
9.94%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTEU vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTEU
Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
6.24%30.80%-0.50%12.45%-7.46%13.43%-19.41%13.50%-16.87%28.91%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.04%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PTEU and FSZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.58

The correlation between PTEU and FSZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTEU vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTEU
FSZ

Financial Services

25.1%
18.9%

Industrials

20.9%
22.0%

Technology

14.6%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
10.0%

Utilities

7.1%
3.1%

Healthcare

5.7%
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
6.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
8.2%

Energy

4.0%

-

Communication Services

3.6%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
3.7%

Financial Services

PTEU
25.1%
FSZ
18.9%

Industrials

PTEU
20.9%
FSZ
22.0%

Technology

PTEU
14.6%
FSZ
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PTEU
8.5%
FSZ
10.0%

Utilities

PTEU
7.1%
FSZ
3.1%

Healthcare

PTEU
5.7%
FSZ
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

PTEU
5.1%
FSZ
6.6%

Basic Materials

PTEU
4.2%
FSZ
8.2%

Energy

PTEU
4.0%
FSZ

-

Communication Services

PTEU
3.6%
FSZ
3.9%

Real Estate

PTEU
1.2%
FSZ
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTEU vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTEU
PTEU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PTEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTEU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PTEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTEU vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTEUFSZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.13

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

0.96

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

2.41

+2.55

PTEU vs. FSZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the FSZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEU and FSZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTEUFSZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.70

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.31

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.50

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.52

-0.22

Drawdowns

PTEU vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTEU drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FSZ drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEU and FSZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTEUFSZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.45%

-33.97%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.82%

-10.39%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-13.93%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.04%

-33.96%

+18.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.45%

-33.97%

-1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-5.11%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

-7.00%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

4.14%

-0.45%

Volatility

PTEU vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) at 4.72%. This indicates that PTEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTEUFSZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

4.72%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

10.70%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

14.25%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

19.34%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

18.95%

-4.37%

PTEU vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTEU has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTEU vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison

PTEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than FSZ's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.39%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%
PTEU
Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
1.81%1.92%3.49%2.74%0.69%1.55%0.00%3.43%1.86%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTEU and FSZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTEU has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to FSZ (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEU dropped -35.45% vs FSZ's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 9.42% vs 4.25% for PTEU. On fees, PTEU is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FSZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTEU is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

FSZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.81% for PTEU.

PTEU tracks Pacer Trendpilot European Index, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTEU and 0.80% for FSZ.

PTEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTEU and FSZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer